Home Entertainment

 

New California Energy Commission TV Regulations

July 14, 2009 By Adrienne Maxwell



To Regulate or Not to Regulate - California considers mandate for TV energy efficiency.

When it comes to environmental policy and regulation, it’s often said that, as goes California, so goes the nation. From clean air to fuel efficiency, the Golden State has led the pack in its attempts to regulate for the sake of the environment. Perhaps that’s why a new California Energy Commission proposal is turning heads in the consumer electronics industry.

The CEC has focused its attention on the issue of energy consumption by flat-panel televisions. The Commission estimates that TV viewing (which includes the television and any connected playback and recording equipment) is responsible for about 10 percent of all residential electricity use in California, and growing screen sizes, higher sales and increased usage present a growing problem.

As such, the CEC has put forth a proposal that would require all televisions sold in California to meet certain energy-efficiency standards beginning in 2011. The Commission is recommending a two-tier approach: Tier 1, which would take effect in 2011, is estimated to reduce TV energy consumption by about 33 percent. The more stringent Tier 2 standard would take effect in 2013 and, in concert with the Tier 1 standard, would reduce TV energy consumption by an estimated 49 percent. (See Figure 1 for the actual formula that will be used to determine a TV’s energy efficiency.)

Should the proposal be approved, all California retailers—big-box chains or specialty A/V stores—would only be allowed to sell models that meet said standards. Such action is certainly not unprecedented in California: The CEC has already put similar regulations on refrigerators, air conditioners, lighting and other products, and has reportedly seen tangible results. The group claims the new TV standard could save consumers from $18 to nearly $30 per year, per television. More importantly, it estimates that the Tier 1 standard would save 3,831 gigawatt hours (GWh) per year, while the Tier 2 standard would save 2,684 GWh per year.

The proposal is supported by all three major California electric utility companies (Pacific Gas and Electric, San Diego Gas and Electric and Southern California Edison), as well as the National Resources Defense Council, the LCD Manufacturers Association and TV manufacturer Vizio, among others.

Not everyone is on board, though. One major voice of opposition is the Consumer Electronics Association, which believes the forced regulation could place undue burden on TV manufacturers and be detrimental to the state, causing job losses and lower tax revenue. One concern is what happens when a consumer can’t purchase the TV model that he or she really wants because it doesn’t meet the proposed standard. What’s to keep them from simply turning to an online retailer? This is a particularly troublesome result for the smaller specialty A/V retailer that can’t afford any potential loss in sales.

The CEC counters that TV manufacturers are already working to reduce energy consumption and claims that 400 current models already meet the Tier 1 standard. It is also in talks with major online retailers regarding the issue of non-compliant TV sales.

The Commission is expected to vote on the proposal this summer; you can find more information at energy.ca.gov.Figure 1

Comments

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Glossary terms will be automatically marked with links to their descriptions. If there are certain phrases or sections of text that should be excluded from glossary marking and linking, use the special markup, [no-glossary] ... [/no-glossary]. Additionally, these HTML elements will not be scanned: a, abbr, acronym, code, pre.

More information about formatting options

Local Guides

 All Guides
   Alabama
   Alaska
   Arizona
   Arkansas
   California
   Colorado
   Connecticut
   DC
   Delaware
   Florida
   Georgia
   Hawaii
   Idaho
   Illinois
   Indiana
   Iowa
   Kansas
   Kentucky
   Louisiana
   Maine
   Maryland
   Massachusetts
   Michigan
   Minnesota
   Mississippi
   Missouri
   Montana
   Nebraska
   Nevada
   New Hampshire
   New Jersey
   New Mexico
   New York
   North Carolina
   North Dakota
   Ohio
   Oklahoma
   Oregon
   Pennsylvania
   Rhode Island
   South Carolina
   South Dakota
   Tennessee
   Texas
   Utah
   Vermont
   Virginia
   Washington
   West Virginia
   Wisconsin
   Wyoming